1. Show or hide comments about the document.

  2. Search over the document's text.

  3. Share the document through social networks or e-mail.

  4. After selecting an area on the page.

  5. ...you can:
    copy the text
    share the segment
    comment
    cite the document

Summer 2017
ISSN 0890-913X
Volume 32, Number 2

Do Economies of Scale Exist in Private Protection? Evaluating Nozick's "Invisible Hand"

Brian Meehan , Berry College
Download Share e-mail
  • << Back to editing
  • Previous version by
  • << Older
  • Newer >>
  • Revert to this one
  • Edit
  • Fullscreen
  • Show comments
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Zoom:
     
     
  • Page:  / 9
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Line spacing:
     
     
  • Word spacing:
     
     
  • Search:FindClose
 
search results
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
432
648
1
0
/index.php?action=ajax&rs=GDMgetPage&rsargs[]=2017 Journal of Private Enterprise vol 32 no 2 Summer parte4.pdf&rsargs[]=0
TheJournalofPrivateEnterprise32(2),2017,8391DoEconomiesofScaleExistinPrivateProtection?EvaluatingNozicksInvisibleHandBrianMeehan*BerryCollege______________________________________________________AbstractRobertNozickarguedthatprivateprotectionservicesproducedinanenvironmentwithoutregulatoryoversightwouldleadtoanaturalmonopoly.Thisargumentsuggeststhatadvantagesineconomiesofscaleincentivizeprotectionfirmstoconcentratewherenoregulatoryauthorityexists.Ifmodernprivatesecurityfirmsaresomewhatanalogoustoprotectionagencies,weshouldobservemoreconcentrated,largerfirmswhentheindustryisleftwithoutregulatoryoversightandmorenumerous,smallerfirmswhenthisindustryisheavilyregulated.Onthecontrary,recentevidencesuggeststhatprivatesecurityfirmsbecomelargerandthenumberoffirmsdeclinesasregulationbecomesmorestringent.______________________________________________________JELCodes:L120,L510Keywords:privatesecurity,regulation,RobertNozick,economiesofscale,naturalmonopolyI.IntroductionThepossibilitythatcompetingprivateprotectionagenciescouldoperateseparatelyinalong-runequilibriumwithinastatelesssocietyhasbeendisputedbysomelibertarianscholars.RobertNozick(1974)wasamongtheleadingproponentsofthisview,arguingthatprivateprotectionagencieswouldconvergeintoanaturalmonopolythroughaninvisiblehandprocess.Theseconvergingfirmswouldeventuallyresembleagovernment.Otherscholars(Friedman1979;Benson1990,1998;Rothbard1973)havearguedthatnumerousprivateprotectionagenciescouldexistwithinastableequilibriuminastatelesssociety.Modernempiricalevidenceonprotectionagenciesoperatingwithoutgovernmentislimited.Somaliaoperatedwithoutacentralizedgovernmentfrom1991through2006andhadclanmilitiasthatofferedprivateprotectionservicesforhire(Leeson*IthankBruceL.BensonandPeterLeesonforhelpingmeformulatetheideaforthispaper.
GLIFOS-digital_archive