1. Show or hide comments about the document.

  2. Search over the document's text.

  3. Share the document through social networks or e-mail.

  4. After selecting an area on the page.

  5. ...you can:
    copy the text
    share the segment
    comment
    cite the document

Fall 2021
ISSN 0890-913X
Volume 36, Number 3

Hayek’s Theory of Business Cycles: A Theory That Will Remain Obscure?*

Simon Bilo, Arlington, VA
Download Share e-mail
  • << Back to editing
  • Previous version by
  • << Older
  • Newer >>
  • Revert to this one
  • Edit
  • Fullscreen
  • Show comments
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Zoom:
     
     
  • Page:  / 21
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Line spacing:
     
     
  • Word spacing:
     
     
  • Search:FindClose
 
search results
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
432
648
1
0
/index.php?action=ajax&rs=GDMgetPage&rsargs[]=2021 Journal of Private Enterprise Vol 36 No 3 Fall parte2.pdf&rsargs[]=0
TheJournalofPrivateEnterprise36(3),2021,2747HayeksTheoryofBusinessCycles:ATheoryThatWillRemainObscure?*SimonBiloArlington,VA______________________________________________________AbstractHayekstheoryofbusinesscycleshasbeencriticizedforitsunfeasiblepolicyprescriptions,weakempiricalsupport,andlackoftechnicalrigor.Althoughthetheorycanbedefendedagainstthesecriticisms,itviolatestherationalexpectationshypothesis,acriterionbywhicheconomiststendtojudgethequalityofeconomicarguments.SinceHayekandhisfollowersfailedtoremedytheviolation,thetheoryinitspresentformcannotcapturetheinterestoftheeconomicsprofession.Thisoutcomemightbeavoidable.However,tochangeit,Hayekstheoryeitherneedsasatisfactoryrestatement,oritmustwaituntileconomistschangetheircriteriaforjudgingthequalityofarguments.______________________________________________________JELCodes:B22,E32Keywords:Austrianbusinesscycletheory,rationalexpectationshypothesis,F.A.HayekI.IntroductionHayekpresentedhistheoryofbusinesscyclesintheearly1930swithgreatsuccess,asdocumentedbyKaldor(1942,p.359),Hicks(1967,pp.ix,203),Caldwell(1988,pp.51617;2004,p.176),andSnowdonandVane(2005,pp.8687).Thatsuccess,however,fadedbytheearly1940s(Caldwell2004,p.176).ProfessionalinterestinHayekstheory,alsoknownastheAustrianbusinesscycletheory,hasnot*IthankPeterBoettke,StephenCasler,HarryDavid,RichardEbeling,KevinHoover,RogerKoppl,AdamMartin,GeraldODriscoll,ShrutiRajagopalan,MarioRizzo,RichardWagner,LawrenceWhite,participantsoftheColloquiumonMarketInstitutionsandEconomicProcessesatNYU,theDepartmentofEconomicsSeminarLuncheonatAlleghenyCollege,theGraduateStudentPaperWorkshopatGMU,theMonetaryEconomicsResearchCluster(MERC)atGMU,andananonymousrefereeforvaluablecommentsandsuggestionsontheearlierdraftsofthepresentpaper.IgratefullyacknowledgethefinancialhelpthatIreceivedfromtheBradleyFoundation,theCenterfortheHistoryofPoliticalEconomyatDukeUniversity,theEarhartFoundation,theInstituteforHumaneStudies,andtheMercatusCenterwhileworkingonthepaper.Alltheusualcaveatsapply.
GLIFOS-digital_archive