1. Show or hide comments about the document.

  2. Search over the document's text.

  3. Share the document through social networks or e-mail.

  4. After selecting an area on the page.

  5. ...you can:
    copy the text
    share the segment
    comment
    cite the document

Summer 2021
ISSN 0890-913X
Volume 36, Number 2

The Soft Stuff of Institutional Development: Culture, Cohesion, and Economic Freedom

Ryan H. Murphy, Southern Methodist University
Download Share e-mail
  • << Back to editing
  • Previous version by
  • << Older
  • Newer >>
  • Revert to this one
  • Edit
  • Fullscreen
  • Show comments
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Zoom:
     
     
  • Page:  / 30
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Line spacing:
     
     
  • Word spacing:
     
     
  • Search:FindClose
 
search results
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
432
648
1
0
/index.php?action=ajax&rs=GDMgetPage&rsargs[]=PARTE3 2021 Journal of Private Enterprise Vol 36 No 2 Summer.pdf&rsargs[]=0
TheJournalofPrivateEnterprise36(2),2021,3766TheSoftStuffofInstitutionalDevelopment:Culture,Cohesion,andEconomicFreedomRyanH.MurphySouthernMethodistUniversity______________________________________________________AbstractWhataretheeffectsofcultureoneconomicinstitutions?Manyseeanessentialroleforcultureininstitutionaldevelopment,arolethatmaybenegativeorpositive.Thispapersystematicallyconsiderstheeffectoftwelvedimensionsofcultureoneconomicfreedom.Noclearpatternemergesamongthevariousdimensionsofculture;adjacentdimensionsofcultureareshowntocorrelatequitedifferentlywitheconomicfreedom.Thisanalysisispartlyframedintermsofthedebateontherelationshipbetweenmigration,culture,andinstitutions,andcastsdoubtsonpositionsthatthesevariablesareastightlyorasconsistentlyrelatedastheyareattimesportrayed.______________________________________________________JELCodes:O43,F22,Z13,D02Keywords:economicfreedom,culture,socialcapital,socialtrust,deeproots,migrationI.IntroductionCultureandinstitutionsprovideessentialsupportforthesuperstructureofthemodernworld.Intuitively,theyaresofundamentallyconnectedthat,fromsomeperspectives,evendrawingadistinctionbetweenthemmaybetocreateadistinctionwithoutadifference(Levy2015,pp.4546).Butoneneednottakethatidiosyncraticpositiontorecognizethatinstitutionsreflectthepeopletheygovern.Acollectivistculturemayagitateformoreilliberaleconomicandpoliticalinstitutions,andonthemargin,thevotemaximizingpoliticianandtheautocratwishingtokeeptheirpositions(McGuireandOlson1996)willfacilitatecoherencebetweeninstitutionsandculturalpreferencestolegitimizethepolity.Socialcapital,socialcohesiveness,andotherculturalvariablesinevitablyimpactinstitutionsinsomeway,althoughtherelationshipsbetweenthemwillnotnecessarilybestraightforwardormonotonic.
GLIFOS-digital_archive