1. Show or hide comments about the document.

  2. Search over the document's text.

  3. Share the document through social networks or e-mail.

  4. After selecting an area on the page.

  5. ...you can:
    copy the text
    share the segment
    comment
    cite the document

Fall 2014
ISSN 0890-913X
Volume 29, Number 3

Adam Smith, Politics, and Natural Liberty

Paul D. Mueller, The King's College, Manhattan
Download Share e-mail
  • << Back to editing
  • Previous version by
  • << Older
  • Newer >>
  • Revert to this one
  • Edit
  • Fullscreen
  • Show comments
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Zoom:
     
     
  • Page:  / 16
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Line spacing:
     
     
  • Word spacing:
     
     
  • Search:FindClose
 
search results
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
612
792
1
0
/index.php?action=ajax&rs=GDMgetPage&rsargs[]=2014.Fall.JPE parte7.pdf&rsargs[]=0
TheJournalofPrivateEnterprise29(3),2014,119134AdamSmith,Politics,andNaturalLibertyPaulD.MuellerGeorgeMasonUniversity______________________________________________________AbstractOverthepastfortyyearsseveralscholarshaveclaimedthatAdamSmiththoughtgovernmentinterventionwasagoodandnaturalaspectofcivilsociety.TheyarguethatSmithoftenportrayspoliticiansandgovernmentinterventionasbeingbenevolent.ButtherearemanymorepassagesfromSmithsmajorworks,TheTheoryofMoralSentimentsandAnInquiryIntotheNatureandCausesoftheWealthofNations,thatsuggestthathedidnotviewgovernmentactorsorgovernmentinterventionasbeingparticularlybenevolent.Instead,Smiththoughtthatgovernmentlaws,onthewhole,wereatbestanecessaryevilbecausetheyencroacheduponhisidealoftheobviousandsimplesystemofnaturalliberty.”______________________________________________________JELCodes:H10,N0,D72Keywords:AdamSmith,Naturalliberty,Faction,Fanaticism,Politics,LaissezfaireI.IntroductionAtensionexistsinbothAnInquiryintotheNatureandCausesoftheWealthofNations(Smith1776)andTheTheoryofMoralSentiments(Smith1759)betweentwoimportant,yetcontradictory,themes.IntheWealthofNations,Smithfrequentlycriticizesgovernmentinterventionbecauseitpreventsself-interestedindividualsfromcoordinatingthemselvesastheyareledbyaninvisiblehand(Smith1776,p.456).Hearguesinfavoroftheobviousandsimplesystemofnaturallibertyandtheinviolablesacredrightofproperty(Smith1776,pp.687,138).Yet,asmanyscholarshavepointedout,inthesamebookSmithclaimsthatgovernmentinterventioncanimprovethemarketbyrestrainingtheexcessesofprivategreedandacquisitiveness(Viner1927;Rothschild2001;Brubaker2006;Kennedy2005,2008).SimilartensionbetweenhisadvocacyoflibertyandhisexceptionstolibertycanbefoundinTheTheoryofMoralSentiments.Scholarshavetakenthistensionintwodifferentdirections.119
GLIFOS-digital_archive