1. Show or hide comments about the document.

  2. Search over the document's text.

  3. Share the document through social networks or e-mail.

  4. After selecting an area on the page.

  5. ...you can:
    copy the text
    share the segment
    comment
    cite the document

Fall 2016
ISSN 0890-913X
Volume 31, Number 3

A Comment on "Measuring Economic Freedom: A Comparison of Two Major Sources"

Ryan H. Murphy, Southern Methodist University
Download Share e-mail
  • << Back to editing
  • Previous version by
  • << Older
  • Newer >>
  • Revert to this one
  • Edit
  • Fullscreen
  • Show comments
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Zoom:
     
     
  • Page:  / 7
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Line spacing:
     
     
  • Word spacing:
     
     
  • Search:FindClose
 
search results
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
432
648
1
0
/index.php?action=ajax&rs=GDMgetPage&rsargs[]=2016 Journal of Private Enterprise vol 31 no 3 Fall parte5.pdf&rsargs[]=0
TheJournalofPrivateEnterprise31(3),2016,6991ACommentonMeasuringEconomicFreedom:AComparisonofTwoMajorSourcesRyanH.MurphySouthernMethodistUniversity______________________________________________________AbstractDosocialscientistshavethetoolstomeasuretheeffectsoffreeeconomicinstitutions?Ram(2014)raisesconcernsregardingthereliabilityofthetwomajorsourcesthatmeasureeconomicfreedom.Thiscommentshowsthatthereislittlereasontobeanymorealarmedaboutourabilitytomeasureeconomicfreedomthanaboutourabilitytomeasureotheraspectsofinstitutionalquality,suchasdemocracy.______________________________________________________JELCodes:O11,O47,P51Keywords:economicfreedom,FraserInstitute,HeritageFoundation,humandevelopmentI.IntroductionDoeseconomicfreedomenhanceordiminishhumanwell-being?Economistsdisagreeaboutwhethergovernmentsshouldinterveneineconomiestotax,subsidize,redistribute,andregulate.Ourabilitytoempiricallytesttheoverallimpactofeconomicfreedomonoutcomesassociatedwithwell-beingisessentialforresolvingthisdisagreement.Butmeasuresofeconomicfreedommustbetrustworthyfortheseteststobeusefulandpersuasive.Ram(2014)findsevidencethatthetwomajorindexesmeasuringeconomicfreedom,theFraserInstitutesEconomicFreedomoftheWorldAnnualReport(Gwartney,Lawson,andHall2013)andtheHeritageFoundationsIndexofEconomicFreedom(Miller,Holmes,andKim2014),areunreliable.Hedemonstratesthatthetwoindexesdivergeinseveralcountries.RamalsoshowsthatthefreedomindexesdivergewhenusedtoexplaintheUnitedNationsDevelopmentProgrammesHumanDevelopmentIndex(HDI).TheFraserandHeritageindexesareasubgenreofindexesmeasuringinstitutionalqualityacrosscountries.Theseindexesaremorecloselycorrelatedtoeachotherthantheyaretoindexeswithotherdefinitionsofinstitutionalquality.Infact,theyaremorecloselyrelatedtooneanotherthanarethetwoindexesmeasuringfree
GLIFOS-digital_archive