1. Show or hide comments about the document.

  2. Search over the document's text.

  3. Share the document through social networks or e-mail.

  4. After selecting an area on the page.

  5. ...you can:
    copy the text
    share the segment
    comment
    cite the document

Spring 2017
ISSN 0890-913X
Volume 32, Number 1

Happiness Economics and Its Discontents

Nimish Adhia, Manhattanville College
Download Share e-mail
  • << Back to editing
  • Previous version by
  • << Older
  • Newer >>
  • Revert to this one
  • Edit
  • Fullscreen
  • Show comments
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Zoom:
     
     
  • Page:  / 12
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Line spacing:
     
     
  • Word spacing:
     
     
  • Search:FindClose
 
search results
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
432
648
1
0
/index.php?action=ajax&rs=GDMgetPage&rsargs[]=2017 Journal of Private Enterprise vol 32 no 1 Spring parte6.pdf&rsargs[]=0
TheJournalofPrivateEnterprise32(1),2017,7788HappinessEconomicsandItsDiscontentsNimishAdhiaManhattanvilleCollege______________________________________________________AbstractSeveralresearchershavestatisticallyanalyzedresponsestocertainsurveyquestionsandclaimedtohavefoundwhatmakespeoplehappy.Theresearchersgoontomakepolicyrecommendationssuchasreducingtheemphasisoneconomicgrowthandexpandingsocialwelfareprograms.Theyhave,however,leftunansweredmajorcriticismsabouttheirconceptual,methodological,andnormativethinking.Thispaperprovidesanaccountofsuchcriticismsorganizedaroundthreemajorthemes.First,happinessresearchersoftenconflatedistinctconcepts,suchaspleasure,happiness,andwell-being.Second,theirmeasuresofhappinessarenotquantitativelymeaningful.Third,theirpolicyrecommendationsarebasedoninsufficientlyrigorousnormativethinking.______________________________________________________JELCodes:A13,B40,Z18Keywords:happiness,subjectivewell-being,welfareanalysis,normativeeconomicsI.IntroductionInthenineteenthcentury,JeremyBenthamexpressedthehopethat,inreformingsociety,politicaleconomistsmightaimforthegreatesthappinessforthegreatestnumber.”Butthatconceptfadedintwentieth-centuryeconomicthoughtbecauseofthegreatdifficultyofmeasuringhappinessacrosspeopleinawaythatisquantifiableandcomparable.Morerecently,agroupofeconomists,psychologists,politicalscientists,andotherresearchersclaimtohavefoundafunctionalmethodofmeasuringhappiness.Wepossesswhatpriorgenerationsconspicuouslylacked,”declaresthepoliticalscientistBenjaminRadcliff(2013).Withtheadventofsophisticatedmodernresearchmethods,wehavelearnedtomeasureandstudyhappiness(p.3).Theopeningparagraphofarecentpaper(2005)bytheeconomistRichardEasterlin,aleaderintheuseofsuchmethods,laysthemoutverysuccinctly.Itakethetermswell-being,”utility,”happiness,”lifesatisfaction,”andwelfaretobeinterchangeableandmeasuredbytheanswertoaquestionsuchasthataskedin
GLIFOS-digital_archive