1. Show or hide comments about the document.

  2. Search over the document's text.

  3. Share the document through social networks or e-mail.

  4. After selecting an area on the page.

  5. ...you can:
    copy the text
    share the segment
    comment
    cite the document

Fall 2018
ISSN 0890-913X
Volume 33, Number 3

Entrepreneurship and Weak Institutions in Latin America

Antonio Lecuna, Universidad del Desarrollo
Roberto Chávez, Universidad Diego Portales
Download Share e-mail
  • << Back to editing
  • Previous version by
  • << Older
  • Newer >>
  • Revert to this one
  • Edit
  • Fullscreen
  • Show comments
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Zoom:
     
     
  • Page:  / 23
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Line spacing:
     
     
  • Word spacing:
     
     
  • Search:FindClose
 
search results
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
432
648
1
0
/index.php?action=ajax&rs=GDMgetPage&rsargs[]=2018 Journal of Private Enterprise Vol 33 No 3 Fall parte2.pdf&rsargs[]=0
TheJournalofPrivateEnterprise33(3),2018,2547EntrepreneurshipandWeakInstitutionsinLatinAmericaAntonioLecuna*UniversidaddelDesarrolloRobertoChávezUniversidadDiegoPortales______________________________________________________AbstractThispaperseekstoexplainhowheterogeneityingovernmentalinstitutionsacrosscountriesaffectsentrepreneurialactivity.DrawingoninsightsfrominstitutionaltheoryandbasedonpaneldatafromeighteenLatinAmericannationsforthe20022014period,thefindingspresentedheresuggestthat(1)decreasingthenumberofdaysrequiredtostartabusinessincreasestheratioofhigh-growthentrepreneurs;(2)corruptionincreasesthenumberofnewlyregisteredcorporationsper1,000working-agepeople;and(3)increasingthetimerequiredtostartabusinessdecreasesthegrowthexpectationofearly-stageentrepreneurialactivityacrossnations.______________________________________________________JELCodes:D73,L26,M13Keywords:entrepreneurialactivity,corruption,institutionaltheory,high-growthentrepreneursI.IntroductionThisstudysuggeststhathigh-growthentrepreneurialactivitydoesnotthriveinaninstitutionalcontextofvoidsandbarriers(Klapper,Laeven,andRajan2006;MacMullen,Bagby,andPalich2008).TheargumentspresentedhereareconsistentwiththoseadvancedbyBaumol(1990),whosuggestedthatinstitutionalvoidsandbarriersmayencourageunproductiveanddestructiveformsofentrepreneurshipandbreednegativesocietalattitudestowardentrepreneurs(Baumol1990).Identifyingtheinstitutionsthatsupportentrepreneurshipmayprovidefurtherinsightsforpolicymakers(Estrin,Mickiewicz,and*AnearlierversionofthismanuscriptwasawardedBestPaperinEntrepreneurshipandPublicPolicyattheUSASBE2016AnnualConferenceinSanDiego.
GLIFOS-digital_archive