1. Show or hide comments about the document.

  2. Search over the document's text.

  3. Share the document through social networks or e-mail.

  4. After selecting an area on the page.

  5. ...you can:
    copy the text
    share the segment
    comment
    cite the document

Spring 2019
ISSN 0890-913X
Volume 34, Number 1

Government vs. Governance: Libertarianism and Private Communities

Michael Makovi, Texas Tech University
Download Share e-mail
  • << Back to editing
  • Previous version by
  • << Older
  • Newer >>
  • Revert to this one
  • Edit
  • Fullscreen
  • Show comments
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Zoom:
     
     
  • Page:  / 19
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Line spacing:
     
     
  • Word spacing:
     
     
  • Search:FindClose
 
search results
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
432
648
1
0
/index.php?action=ajax&rs=GDMgetPage&rsargs[]=2019 Journal of Private Enterprise Vol 34 No 1 Spring PARTE3.pdf&rsargs[]=0
TheJournalofPrivateEnterprise34(1),2019,3957Governmentvs.Governance:LibertarianismandPrivateCommunitiesMichaelMakoviTexasTechUniversity______________________________________________________AbstractLibertarianstendtoopposehierarchicalauthorityandadvocatetheprivatizationofpublicgoods.However,notallcollectiveactionproblemscanbesolvedsoeasily;collectiveproblemsmayrequirecollectivesolutions.Fortunately,theessenceofthemarketprocessisnottheatomicindividual,butconsent.Libertariansshouldendorsehierarchical,bureaucraticsolutionsaslongasmembershipisvoluntary.Iprovideageneraltheoryoftheproprietarycommunityasasolutiontocollectiveactionproblems.Suchacommunityembodiesconsent,jurisdictionalcompetition,andresidualclaimancy(incentivealignment),mitigatingcollectiveactionproblemsinahierarchicalandconsensualbutneverthelessmarket-basedmanner.______________________________________________________JELCodes:H11,H41,D71Keywords:privatecommunity,proprietarygovernance,homeownersassociation,anarchism,anarcho-capitalismI.IntroductionLibertariansmaybethoughttobeinveterateopponentsofauthorityandhierarchy.Afterall,theydemandfreedom.Typically,economistsarguethatgovernmentisnecessarytoprovidepublicgoods.Libertarianstendtoreplythat(nearly)everypublicgoodcanbeprovidedprivatelybythefreemarket.Whowillbuildtheroads?Why,themarketwill!However,noteverypublicgoodcanbeprivatizedsoeasily.Collectiveactionproblemsarereal.Andcollectiveproblemsmayrequirecollectivesolutions.Pennington(2011,pp.23335)notesthatveryfew[collectivegoods]arecompletelyindivisibleinsupplyandmostareterritorial.”HearguesthatasimplisticformofprivatizationwhereresourcesaresimplyparceledouttoindividualIthankmyprofessor,AlexanderSalter,forreadingandcommentingonadraft.Thispaperwaspresentedatthe2018meetingoftheAssociationofPrivateEnterpriseEducation.Allmistakesaremine.
GLIFOS-digital_archive