1. Show or hide comments about the document.

  2. Search over the document's text.

  3. Share the document through social networks or e-mail.

  4. After selecting an area on the page.

  5. ...you can:
    copy the text
    share the segment
    comment
    cite the document

Winter 2019
ISSN 0890-913X
Volume 34, Number 4

Hearts of Stone: Analyzing Anarchic Bukhtarman Stonemason Communities in Eighteenth-Century Russia

V. V. Maltsev, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Download Share e-mail
  • << Back to editing
  • Previous version by
  • << Older
  • Newer >>
  • Revert to this one
  • Edit
  • Fullscreen
  • Show comments
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Zoom:
     
     
  • Page:  / 18
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Line spacing:
     
     
  • Word spacing:
     
     
  • Search:FindClose
 
search results
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
432
648
1
0
/index.php?action=ajax&rs=GDMgetPage&rsargs[]=2019 Journal of Private Enterprise Vol 34 No 4 Winter parte1.pdf&rsargs[]=0
TheJournalofPrivateEnterprise34(4),2019,118HeartsofStone:AnalyzingAnarchicBukhtarmanStonemasonCommunitiesinEighteenth-CenturyRussiaV.V.Maltsev*FinancialUniversityundertheGovernmentoftheRussianFederation__________________________________________________________AbstractTheidealofastrongstateforeconomicdevelopmentandprovisionofsecurityhasalwaysbeenprevalentinRussianhistory,especiallyinnativistthought.ThispaperarguesagainstthisperspectivebyanalyzingthestatelessBukhtarmanstonemasoncommunitiesoftheeighteenthcenturythatthrivedoutsideofstatecontrolinthemountainousregionneartheBukhtarmariver.Ishowthatthroughentrepreneurialfreedom,freetrade,normsfordisputeresolution,andsignalingthroughadoptionoffaith,theseanarchiccommunitieswereabletoavoidtheHobbesianwarofallagainstallandsubstantiallyimprovetheireconomicwelfare.__________________________________________________________JELCodes:P49Keywords:anarchy,Bukhtarmanstonemasons,institutions,efficiency,cooperationI.IntroductionIsastrongstateanecessityfortheeconomicdevelopmentofRussia?AccordingtothedominantnativistperspectiveinRussia,autocracyisessentialtothecountrysdevelopment.NativistspointtotheRussianstatesuniqueabilitytomobilizeresourcesforlong-termdevelopment,”andhistorianNikolaiKaramzinarguedthatAutocracyisthePalladiumofRussia;onitsintegritydependsRussiashappiness(Tsygankov2014,pp.56).AccordingtoBerdyaev(1948,p.14),WithoutthereformofPeter[theGreat],theRussianStateitselfwouldhavebeenincapablebothofself-defenceandofdevelopment.”Nakhimova(2011,pp.154155)pointsouttheincreasingpopularityofStalininmodernRussianmediaanditscall*Ithankthejournaleditorandtwoanonymousreviewersforinsightfulcommentsandsuggestionsonthefirstversionofthispaper.IalsothankGeorginaReederforproofreadingandassistancewiththeeditingprocess.
GLIFOS-digital_archive