1. Show or hide comments about the document.

  2. Search over the document's text.

  3. Share the document through social networks or e-mail.

  4. After selecting an area on the page.

  5. ...you can:
    copy the text
    share the segment
    comment
    cite the document

Spring 2020
ISSN 0890-913X
Volume 35, Number 1

Private Prerogative, Public Purpose: Political Entrepreneurship and Management in Frederick the Great’s Anti-Machiavel

Alexander W. Salter, Texas Tech University
Download Share e-mail
  • << Back to editing
  • Previous version by
  • << Older
  • Newer >>
  • Revert to this one
  • Edit
  • Fullscreen
  • Show comments
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Zoom:
     
     
  • Page:  / 28
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Line spacing:
     
     
  • Word spacing:
     
     
  • Search:FindClose
 
search results
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
432
648
1
0
/index.php?action=ajax&rs=GDMgetPage&rsargs[]=2020 Journal of Private Enterprise Vol 35 No 1 Spring parte1.pdf&rsargs[]=0
TheJournalofPrivateEnterprise35(1),2020,128PrivatePrerogative,PublicPurpose:PoliticalEntrepreneurshipandManagementinFredericktheGreatsAnti-MachiavelAlexanderW.SalterTexasTechUniversity__________________________________________________________AbstractIcontributetotheliteratureonpoliticalentrepreneurshipbyanalyzingtheroleofthepoliticalentrepreneurinFredericktheGreatsAnti-Machiavel.FredericktheGreat(FrederickIIofPrussia)isbestknownforturningPrussiaintoaninternationalpowerduringthemidtolateeighteenthcentury.Hisperspectiveongovernancecontainsmanyvaluableinsightsintothenatureofpoliticalentrepreneurship,theinstitutionswithinwhichitoccurs,anditseffectsonmaterialprosperity.IdetailkeypointsfromAnti-Machiavelthatcanadvancescholarshiponpoliticalentrepreneurship.IconcludebydiscussinghowFredericksinsightsintopoliticalentrepreneurshipcanbeputtowork.__________________________________________________________JELCodes:B11,H11,M1,P16Keywords:cameralism,enlightenedabsolutism,entrepreneurship,FredericktheGreat,politicalentrepreneurship,publicadministrationWhatisprudenceintheconductofeveryprivatefamily,canscarcebefollyinthatofagreatkingdom.AdamSmithI.IntroductionPoliticalentrepreneurshiphasrecentlybecomeasignificanttopicineconomics,politicalscience,andmanagerialscience(e.g.,Agarwaletal.2009;BernierandHafsi2007;BjerregaardandLauring2012;BystedandJespersen2014;KivlenieceandQuelin2012;Kleinetal.2010,2013;LeydenandLink2015;MartinandThomas2013;McCaffreyandSalerno2014;McGinnisandOstrom2012;Ostrom2005;Skarbek2016).Studiesofpoliticalentrepreneurshiptakeinsightsfrommarketentrepreneurshipandapplythemtopoliticstounderstandthedynamicsofinstitutionalchange.Theoreticalstudiesadvanceourunderstandingofpoliticalentrepreneurshipinwaysthatincreaseitsapplicability;empiricalstudiesadvanceourunderstanding
GLIFOS-digital_archive