1. Show or hide comments about the document.

  2. Search over the document's text.

  3. Share the document through social networks or e-mail.

  4. After selecting an area on the page.

  5. ...you can:
    copy the text
    share the segment
    comment
    cite the document

Spring 2020
ISSN 0890-913X
Volume 35, Number 1

The Impact of Certificate of Need Laws on Emergency Department Wait Times

Molly S. Myers, Creighton University
Kathleen M. Sheehan, Creighton University
Download Share e-mail
  • << Back to editing
  • Previous version by
  • << Older
  • Newer >>
  • Revert to this one
  • Edit
  • Fullscreen
  • Show comments
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Zoom:
     
     
  • Page:  / 17
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Line spacing:
     
     
  • Word spacing:
     
     
  • Search:FindClose
 
search results
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
432
648
1
0
/index.php?action=ajax&rs=GDMgetPage&rsargs[]=2020 Journal of Private Enterprise Vol 35 No 1 Spring parte3.pdf&rsargs[]=0
TheJournalofPrivateEnterprise35(1),2020,5975TheImpactofCertificateofNeedLawsonEmergencyDepartmentWaitTimesMollyS.MyersCreightonUniversityKathleenM.SheehanCreightonUniversity______________________________________________________AbstractCertificateofneed(CON)lawsrestrictthesupplyofmedicalservices,fromnursinghomebedstothenumberofdialysismachinesperhospital.Theserestrictionshavethepotentialtolowerthestandardofcarepeoplereceive.ThispaperempiricallyinvestigateshowCONlawsaffectemergencydepartmentwaittimesandfindsthatCONlawshaveastatisticallysignificantimpactonincreasingthemedianwaittimeformedicalexamination,painmedicationadministration,hospitaladmittance,andhospitaldischarge.ThesefindingssupporttheideathatmovementtowardafreermarketforhealthcareservicesthroughareductioninCONlawscouldimprovepatientoutcomes.______________________________________________________JELCodes:I11,I18,D04Keywords:certificateofneed,regulation,healthcaremarketsI.IntroductionCertificateofNeed(CON)lawshavebeenrelevantinhealthcareandAmericanpoliticssincetheirnationalimplementationin1979.Theselawsstatedgoalistodecreasehealthcarespendingbyrequiringprospectivehealthcarefirmstopetitionforproofthatsubstantiveneedforafacilityexistswherethefacilityintendstoenter.UnderCONlaws,prospectivefirmsfacearigorousapprovalprocesstoenterthemarket,resultinginareducedsupplyoffacilitiesand,consequently,adecreaseinthehealthcaresupplied.TheCONlawregulationreducestheamountofhealthcareavailable.Lawmakersbelievedthatreducinghealthcaresupplywouldreduceextraneousspendingforhospitals,decreasinghealthcareWethanktheparticipantsinCreightonUniversitysInstituteforEconomicInquiryResearchFellowsprogramforvaluablecomments.
GLIFOS-digital_archive