1. Show or hide comments about the document.

  2. Search over the document's text.

  3. Share the document through social networks or e-mail.

  4. After selecting an area on the page.

  5. ...you can:
    copy the text
    share the segment
    comment
    cite the document

Spring 2023
ISSN 0890-913X
Volume 38, Number 1

Information Externalities: A Further Note on the Market Provision of National Defense

Garrett R. Wood, Virginia Wesleyan University
Download Share e-mail
  • << Back to editing
  • Previous version by
  • << Older
  • Newer >>
  • Revert to this one
  • Edit
  • Fullscreen
  • Show comments
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Zoom:
     
     
  • Page:  / 5
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Line spacing:
     
     
  • Word spacing:
     
     
  • Search:FindClose
 
search results
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
432
648
1
0
/index.php?action=ajax&rs=GDMgetPage&rsargs[]=2023 Journal of Private Enterprise Vol 38 No1 Spring parte4.pdf&rsargs[]=0
TheJournalofPrivateEnterprise38(1),2023,71-75InformationExternalities:AFurtherNoteontheMarketProvisionofNationalDefenseGarrettR.WoodVirginiaWesleyanUniversityAbstractMarketssufferfromafree-riderproblemintheprovisionofnationaldefense,butoffensealsosuffersfromafree-riderproblem.Anopportunisticcountrymayattempttocapturethespoilsgeneratedbyanothercountrysoffensiveefforts,orothercountriesmayfreelyenjoythesatisfactionofseeingahatedenemydefeatedbyacountrythatpaysforanoffensiveagainstit.Offensealsogeneratesapreviouslyunconsideredbenefitforfree-ridersintheformofvaluableinformationaboutthecapabilitiesoftheoffenseanddefense,andthescaleofthisbenefitisincreasingwithtechnologicalandeconomicadvancementaroundtheworld.JELCodes:F52,H10,H40Keywords:nationaldefense,free-riderproblem,anarchyI.IntroductionEconomicanalysisoftheprovisionofnationaldefensehastendedtofindinfavorofgovernmentprovisionovermarketprovisionbecauseofthefree-riderproblem.Marketprovisionofdefense,especiallyatthescaleofanentirenation,canproducebenefitstononpayers,whoarethereforeincentivizednottocontributetowardaservicetheyvalue,leavingthepopulationsomewhereshortofthetheoreticalwelfaremaximizingsupplyofdefense.Leeson,Coyne,andDuncan(2014;2016)notethatthefree-riderproblemsimultaneouslyhinderstheprovisionofnationaloffenseandthatitis,therefore,possiblethatevendefensethatdoesnotmeetthetheoreticallyoptimallevelmaybesufficienttodeteranonoptimaloffense.Thisargumentcanbeextendedtoincludeexternalbenefitsgeneratedbytheoffensethatwerenotconsideredbytheseauthors,andevidenceoftheseexternalbenefitsisavailableinthecurrentconflictinUkraine.Thisnotearguesthatinformationaboutthecombatantsgeneratedbytheactofaggressionisabenefitthat,thankstotechnologicaladvancement,isincreasinglyavailabletonotjustthevictimsofaggressionbutalsotheaggressorsnon-engagedenemiesandcompetitors.Moreover,thisinformationisgatheredanddistributed
GLIFOS-digital_archive