1. Show or hide comments about the document.

  2. Search over the document's text.

  3. Share the document through social networks or e-mail.

  4. After selecting an area on the page.

  5. ...you can:
    copy the text
    share the segment
    comment
    cite the document

Fall 2010
ISSN 0890-913X
Volume 26, Number 1

Peter Boettke's New Comparative Political Economy as Libertarian Scholarship

Daniel J. D'Amico, Loyola University New Orleans
Download Share e-mail
  • << Back to editing
  • Previous version by
  • << Older
  • Newer >>
  • Revert to this one
  • Edit
  • Fullscreen
  • Show comments
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Zoom:
     
     
  • Page:  / 17
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Line spacing:
     
     
  • Word spacing:
     
     
  • Search:FindClose
 
search results
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
612
792
1
0
/jpe/index.php?action=ajax&rs=GDMgetPage&rsargs[]=Fall_2010_10.pdf&rsargs[]=0
TheJournalofPrivateEnterprise26(1),2010,85-101PeterBoettkesNewComparativePoliticalEconomyasLibertarianScholarshipDanielJ.DAmico*LoyolaUniversityAbstractThispaperattemptstosurveyandpartiallyresolveadebateamidstfactionswithinthebroadertraditionoflibertarianpoliticaleconomy.WhilenaturalrightstheoristsandPublicChoiceeconomistsareoftenatoddsconcerningtheproperwaytoanalyzetheroleofgovernmentinsociety,eachframeworkcanbeusedinconjunctionwithoneanother.Personalaccountsarepresentedtodemonstratehowtheseframeworksmaybecomplementstooneanotherforstudentsinterestedinpromotingaprogressiveresearchagendafocuseduponsocialchangetowardsafreesociety.TheresearchandmentorshipofPeterBoettkeispresentedasanidealexampleofsuchsuccessfulapplications.JELCodes:A23,A14Keywords:Naturalrights;PublicChoice;PeterBoettkeI.Introduction:LibertarianPoliticalEconomySincetherecentfinancialcrises,freemarkettheoryandlibertarianpoliticalphilosophyhavereceivedmorepublicattentionthaninpreviousyears.Thereseemstobeagrowingformofsocialanxietyamongstthosewhoaredissatisfiedwithgovernmentbutlacktheknowledgeand/orthemeanstoaffectsocialchange.Idonotmeantoimplythatthesepopularmovementsarethemostsophisticatedorthestrongestargumentsforlibertytoday.Ionlymentionthembecausetheyshareacommonbasicworldviewinfavorofpersonallibertyandskepticalofgovernmentlargess.Ialsowanttodrawattentiontothefactthattheiranxietyseemstostem,notsomuchfromthecontentoftheirideology,butratherfromtheirinabilitytobringaboutthesocialchangesprescribedtherein.Wheretheyarefound,freemarketsandpersonallibertytendtopromotepeaceandprosperity(GwartneyandLawson,2009).Onthis*IwishtothankEdStringhamforhelpfulcomments.Responsibilityforallremainingerrorsismine.85
GLIFOS-digital_archive