1. Show or hide comments about the document.

  2. Search over the document's text.

  3. Share the document through social networks or e-mail.

  4. After selecting an area on the page.

  5. ...you can:
    copy the text
    share the segment
    comment
    cite the document

Summer 2023
ISSN 0890-913X
Volume 38, Number 2

The Death of Labor Market Competition Has Been Greatly Exaggerated

Timothy Perri Perri, Appalachian State University
Download Share e-mail
  • << Back to editing
  • Previous version by
  • << Older
  • Newer >>
  • Revert to this one
  • Edit
  • Fullscreen
  • Show comments
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Zoom:
     
     
  • Page:  / 16
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Line spacing:
     
     
  • Word spacing:
     
     
  • Search:FindClose
 
search results
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
432
648
1
0
/index.php?action=ajax&rs=GDMgetPage&rsargs[]=Journal of Private Enterprise Vol 38 No2 Summer parte3.pdf&rsargs[]=0
TheJournalofPrivateEnterprise38(2),2023,39-54TheDeathofLaborMarketCompetitionHasBeenGreatlyExaggeratedTimothyPerri*AppalachianStateUniversityUnitedStatesofAmericaAbstractIcritiquerecenttheoreticalandempiricalresearchthatsuggeststhatlabormarketsarenotnearlyascompetitiveashasgenerallybeenassumed.Iarguethatno-poachingagreementsandcovenantsnottocompetemayreducethenumberofcompetitorsandthusthewage,butfirmsarestillwagetakers.Thismeanstheminimumwagewillnotincreaseemployment.JELCodes:J31,J42Keywords:monopsony,marketconcentrationIntroductionMonopsonyhasbeenrediscoveredinthelastseveraldecades.Onedetailedanalysis,inabookbyManning(2003),arguesthatmonopsonyispervasiveinlabormarkets.ThevastnessofmodernlabormarketssuggeststhatManningsclaimisimplausible,althoughKruegerandAshenfelter(2022)arguethatagreementsnottopoachtheemployeesofcompetitorsofferanexplanationformonopsony.OtherrecentresearchsuggeststhatthelevelofmonopsonypowerinUSlabormarketsissignificant.Anadditionalissueiswhetherlabormarketmonopsonyexplainsthefindingthattheeffectsoftheminimumwageonemploymentarenon-negative(Card2022).H.GreggLewis,thefatherofmodernlaboreconomics(Hamermesh2020),argueddecadesagothatmonopsonyisonlyinvokedindiscussionsoftheminimumwageandisthesoleargumentfortheminimumwage(Lewisn.d.).1Todaymonopsonyisinvokedtoexplainlowearningsofsomegroups.*Ithankananonymousrefereeforcommentsthatgreatlyimprovedthepaper.IalsothankMikeGibbsandDonParsonsforcommentsonanearlierversionofthepaper.1Lewis(n.d.)isasetoflecturenotesfromthegraduatelabor-economicscourseLewistaughtattheUniversityofChicago.Theindividualwhocompiledthenotesisunknowntome.Theyarelikelyfromthelate1960s.
GLIFOS-digital_archive