1. Show or hide comments about the document.

  2. Search over the document's text.

  3. Share the document through social networks or e-mail.

  4. After selecting an area on the page.

  5. ...you can:
    copy the text
    share the segment
    comment
    cite the document

Spring 2011
ISSN 0890-913X
Volume 26, Number 2

On Rothbard on the Shifting and Incidence of a General Sales Tax: A Critique

William Barnett, Loyola University New Orleans
Walter E. Block, Loyola University New Orleans
Download Share e-mail
  • << Back to editing
  • Previous version by
  • << Older
  • Newer >>
  • Revert to this one
  • Edit
  • Fullscreen
  • Show comments
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Zoom:
     
     
  • Page:  / 10
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Line spacing:
     
     
  • Word spacing:
     
     
  • Search:FindClose
 
search results
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
612
792
1
0
/jpe/index.php?action=ajax&rs=GDMgetPage&rsargs[]=Spring2011 7.pdf&rsargs[]=0
TheJournalofPrivateEnterprise26(2),2011,117-126OnRothbardontheShiftingandIncidenceofaGeneralSalesTax:ACritiqueWilliamBarnettIILoyolaUniversityNewOrleansWalterE.BlockLoyolaUniversityNewOrleansAbstractRothbardtakesthepositionthatageneralsalestaxcannotbeshiftedforwardontoconsumers.Inhisview,costsofproduction,ofwhichataxisaninstance,cannotdetermineprice.Rather,thecausationisintheotherdirection:Thepricesofcapitalandintermediategoodsarederivedfromthevalueofthefinalorconsumergoodsthattheycreate.Incontrast,wetakethepositionthatthecausaleffectsrunnotinonlyonebutinbothdirections.JELCodes:H22Keywords:Costsofproduction;Taxshifting;Taxincidence;Deriveddemand;Costpushinflation;MonetarismI.IntroductionWhobearstheburdenofsalestaxes?Isittheproducer,theconsumer,orsomecombinationofthetwo?Thetraditional,mainstream,neoclassicalanalysisoftaxshiftingandincidencereliesontheelasticitiesofdemandandsupplycurves.Here,taxescanbeshiftedforwardontoconsumers,dependingupontheseelasticities.Thetraditional,mainstreamAustrianview,1insharpcontrast,undertheleadershipofRothbard(2004),drawstheoppositeconclusion.Elasticitiesplaynorolewhatsoever,andforthisauthorandthosewhohavefollowedhimonthismatter,itisapraxeologicalcertaintythattheincidenceoftaxescannotbeshiftedinaforwarddirection.ThepresentauthorsalsowritefromanAustrianperspective,butofferacriticismofthisanalysis.WedemonstratethatRothbardisincorrectinthattheimpositionofageneralsalestaxaltersthe1Weconfesstoagreatpartialitytothisphrase.117
GLIFOS-digital_archive