1. Show or hide comments about the document.

  2. Search over the document's text.

  3. Share the document through social networks or e-mail.

  4. After selecting an area on the page.

  5. ...you can:
    copy the text
    share the segment
    comment
    cite the document

Spring 2010
ISSN 0890-913X
Volume 25, Number 2

The Meaning of "Economic Goodness": Critical comments on Klein and Briggeman

Israel M. Kirzner, New York University
Download Share e-mail
  • << Back to editing
  • Previous version by
  • << Older
  • Newer >>
  • Revert to this one
  • Edit
  • Fullscreen
  • Show comments
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Zoom:
     
     
  • Page:  / 31
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Line spacing:
     
     
  • Word spacing:
     
     
  • Search:FindClose
 
search results
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
612
792
1
0
/jpe/index.php?action=ajax&rs=GDMgetPage&rsargs[]=Spring_2010_2.pdf&rsargs[]=0
TheJournalofPrivateEnterprise25(2),2010,55-85TheMeaningofEconomicGoodness”:CriticalCommentsonKleinandBriggemanIsraelM.KirznerNewYorkUniversityAbstractKleinandBriggemanscondemnatoryjudgments(a)ofthisauthorand(b)ofmodernAustrianeconomicsareinterpretedasapparentlyattributabletoapre-analyticalrejectionofallpurelyeconomicnormativediscussion.Uponexamination,alltheirspecificcriticismsreadilydissolveasrepresentingunfortunatemisunderstandingsorargumentationinappropriatelyapplyingtheirworldview(inwhichthereisnonormativeroleforthepurelyeconomic)toaquitedifferentconceptualcontext.KleinandBriggemansrevisionisdoctrinalclassification(resentingmodernAustrianeconomicsascontrasted(!)withHayekswork)iscategoricallyrejectedasreflecting(i)quitemistakenassumptionsconcerningmodernAustrianeconomicsand(ii)seriousmisunderstandingsofHayekscontributions.JELCodes:B00Keywords:Entrepreneurship;CoordinationI.IntroductionDanielB.KleinandJasonBriggemanhavewrittenatroublingpaperunderthetitleIsraelKirzneronCoordinationandDiscovery(2010).Theirpapermaybeseenashavingtwodistinctaspects.Mostofthepaperconsistsofaseriesofexceedinglysharpcriticismsoftwopapersofminethatfocusedonthecoordinationconcept.Asweshallsee,thesecriticismsturnouteithertobebasedonapparentmisunderstandings,orsimplytoreflectaconceptualframeworkdrasticallydifferentfrommyown.ThesubstanceofthesecriticismsdoesnotidentifyseriousflawsintheMises-Hayekunderstandingofthemarketprocess,asmyworkhasattemptedtoelaborateit.ButthisaspectoftheKlein-Briggemanpaper(whichIwillhenceforth,withnodisrespectintended,callK-B)isperhapslesssignificantthanthesecondaspect.EvenifK-B´scriticismswerevalid,itwouldbenecessarytopointoutcertainseriousintellectualpitfallscontainedintheirpaper.Thisisbecausetheircriticismsareembeddedinan55
GLIFOS-digital_archive