1. Show or hide comments about the document.

  2. Search over the document's text.

  3. Share the document through social networks or e-mail.

  4. After selecting an area on the page.

  5. ...you can:
    copy the text
    share the segment
    comment
    cite the document

Spring 2010
ISSN 0890-913X
Volume 25, Number 2

Kirznerian Entrepreneurship as a Misesian Solution to a Hayekian Problem

Steven Horwitz, St. Lawrence University
Download Share e-mail
  • << Back to editing
  • Previous version by
  • << Older
  • Newer >>
  • Revert to this one
  • Edit
  • Fullscreen
  • Show comments
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Zoom:
     
     
  • Page:  / 7
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Line spacing:
     
     
  • Word spacing:
     
     
  • Search:FindClose
 
search results
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
612
792
1
0
/jpe/index.php?action=ajax&rs=GDMgetPage&rsargs[]=Spring_2010_4.pdf&rsargs[]=0
TheJournalofPrivateEnterprise25(2),2010,97-103KirznerianEntrepreneurshipasaMisesianSolutiontoaHayekianProblemStevenHorwitzSt.LawrenceUniversityAbstractThiscommentonpapersbyKleinandBriggeman(2010)andKirzner(2010)arguesthatKirznersworkonentrepreneurshipandcoordinationisbestunderstoodasofferingasolutiontotheproblemofhowknowledgeisspreadthroughmarketsasposedinHayeksEconomicsandKnowledgeessay(1937).Itistheentrepreneurwhofacilitatesthismicroeconomiccoordinationbybridgingthoseknowledgegaps.ThisconceptofcoordinationisdistinctfromKleinandBriggemansconcatenatecoordination,”asKirznernotes.ThepapertriestoclarifytheseissuesandsuggeststhatKleinandBriggemanarereallytalkingaboutorder,”notcoordination.”JELCodes:B25,B53Keywords:Coordination;Entrepreneurship;EquilibriumI.IntroductionTheexchangebetweenKleinandBriggeman(2010)andKirzner(2010)involvessomeofthemostabstractandcomplexquestionswefaceintryingtounderstandwhatitisthatmarketeconomiesdoandhowexactlytheydoit.Theyarealsoquestionsofgreatimportanceforourabilitytodefendtheclassicalliberalargumentforthebeneficenceofmarkets,astheback-and-forthoverthoseissuesintheexchangebearout.And,asKirznernotes,theverynatureofeconomicsasadistinctscienceisalsoatstakegiventheargumentthatKleinandBriggeman(henceforth,followingKirzner,K-B)make.EvenasIunderstandtheconcernsthatK-Bhaveaboutthe100%”categoricalclaimstheybelieveKirznertobemaking,concernsthatIshareinmanyways,IdothinkthattheyareunfairtoKirzneralongseveraldimensions.AsKirznerhimselfnotes,theyhavemisreadhisviewofwhatpreciselyconstitutescoordinationinastrictlyeconomiccontext.KirznersfocusismorenarrowthanthatofK-97
GLIFOS-digital_archive